With reference to comments made by a Malta Football Association vice-president (Carmelo Bartolo) recently, the General Workers' Union feels disappointed that "clubs see the union as a threat" and that "clubs went on the warpath when it emerged that the players' body had elected to join a local trade union".

Such comments are very worrying in a day and age when social dialogue between employers, unions and regulators is promoted to ensure progress and stability of an enterprise, sector or area of society. Such an approach is completely opposite to these efforts. At international level, FIFA and the federation of players, FIFpro, have fostered social dialogue. So much so, that when a players association or union joins FIFpro, FIFA extends its recognition.

Furthermore, most players' associations in Europe are either a union or associated to a local trade union. This is promoted also by FIFpro in its guidelines to new player groupings worldwide.

Unions are also part of EU initiatives whereby employers, unions and regulators come together under social dialogue efforts in sport. Most sports federations in Europe participate in this programme.

It is therefore an isolated case, unfortunately in Malta, that the MFA's key actor (clubs) have such a view of unions in sport.

All those persons who are economically active through sport are correct in seeking employment and industrial relations support from a union. Such an approach adopted by local clubs is what actually generates deteriorated relationships between stakeholders. Local football can benefit from the contribution of players supported by a union. Labour regulation and conditions of employment can also be improved to ensure progress and compliance. Such progress and compliance should not cause fear but should instead be a challenge that can be addressed in good faith by all actors.

The union appeals to all stakeholders to be positive and avoid negative initiatives and confrontations.